Message Board
Banter
| Message board > Banter | 147 to 196 of 206 |
 | |
   |
| ||
| by KSS - Sat 2nd Feb 2002, 12:04am | ||
| Right. The time has come again. Bop playlist requests here please.
And don't even mention Whigfield. | ||
| ||
| by mjb - Fri 11th Jan 2002, 7:12pm | ||
the pretender said: Matthew-you're supposed to be explaining why you weren't at Life. Wasn't it incredibly obvious? I was watching TV. Seems a good enough excuse to me. | ||
| ||
| by the pretender - Fri 11th Jan 2002, 6:19pm | ||
| Honestly I try and introduce some artsy intellectual discourse to the message board and you all bring it back to rowing and/or physics. I mean I know it's the boat club message board and it's Trinity but afford me some diversity please.
Matthew-you're supposed to be explaining why you weren't at Life. Wasn't it incredibly obvious? | ||
| ||
| by the pretender - Fri 11th Jan 2002, 6:19pm | ||
| Honestly I try and introduce some artsy intellectual discourse to the message board and you all bring it back to rowing and/or physics. I mean I know it's the boat club message board and it's Trinity but afford me some diversity please.
Matthew-you're supposed to be explaining why you weren't at Life. Wasn't it incredibly obvious? | ||
| ||
| by gf - Fri 11th Jan 2002, 5:05pm | ||
rowing physics 101 said: Work = force x distance.
Although of course, before anyone else points this out, rowing is much more concerned with useful work done.I.e. pull fucking hard and don't shorten up. | ||
| ||
| by rowing physics 101 - Fri 11th Jan 2002, 5:04pm | ||
Work - what does this word mean ? Work = force x distance.
I.e. pull fucking hard and don't shorten up. | ||
| ||
| by TV is good, work is bad - Fri 11th Jan 2002, 4:11pm | ||
bit on the defensive side said: Ahem. One hour's break to TRY and watch some quality TV in the JCR when one has spent one's entire day either working or rowing is totally acceptable. I didn't even do that in the end and was forced to return to the books by 9.30.
I was indeed watching TV, as were five or six others, so please don't just have a go at me :(
Grump. Anyway, you WERE watching TV (you TV hogging person) and you weren't at Life so what's your excuse? I hope you weren't pretending to work. What am I supposed to be making excuses about ? Work - what does this word mean ? | ||
| ||
| by the pretender - Fri 11th Jan 2002, 1:20pm | ||
| Thank you Simon for that lovely visual image. I'm sure it will stay with us all for a long time. | ||
| ||
| by Simon - Fri 11th Jan 2002, 12:31pm | ||
Bored by work said: Okay. So, 17 FaT men go to Life led by the inimitable Mr Walker, presumably many were quite well oiled. Not in the Chippendales sense of the word "oiled", one hopes. | ||
| ||
| by bit on the defensive side - Fri 11th Jan 2002, 12:22am | ||
| Ahem. One hour's break to TRY and watch some quality TV in the JCR when one has spent one's entire day either working or rowing is totally acceptable. I didn't even do that in the end and was forced to return to the books by 9.30.
Grump. Anyway, you WERE watching TV (you TV hogging person) and you weren't at Life so what's your excuse? I hope you weren't pretending to work. | ||
| ||
| by Should be working, but can't be bothered - Thu 10th Jan 2002, 11:28pm | ||
Bored by work said: ...Those of us who have to stay in and work ... You didn't seem to be doing that much work :) | ||
| ||
| by Bored by work - Thu 10th Jan 2002, 10:43pm | ||
| Okay. So, 17 FaT men go to Life led by the inimitable Mr Walker, presumably many were quite well oiled. Where, may I ask, is the gossip? Honestly, I know that you're all upset that the girls didn't come with you but surely there was some carnage? Those of us who have to stay in and work need something to keep us going you know. If there really isn't any gossip then I suggest you all redeem yourselves sharpish and make some up. | ||
| ||
| by dw229 - Sat 5th Jan 2002, 5:31pm | ||
| Will someone explain to me how on Earth, when I did a search for all the photo files on my hard drive, these pictures of Simon Blackburn (and his Mum?) came up???
http://dw229.trin.cam.ac.uk/images/me.bmp http://dw229.trin.cam.ac.uk/images/scan0.jpg http://dw229.trin.cam.ac.uk/images/scan1.jpg Quite disturbing | ||
| ||
| by Simon - Fri 4th Jan 2002, 8:28am | ||
| Good to see the word most commonly used to link to the website in the last month (see the "Monthly statistics" page) is rowing related. | ||
| ||
| by Simon - Thu 13th Dec 2001, 8:48am | ||
A film crew arrived in Burrell's yesterday (don't know what they're filming, but it looks amateur-ish). Find out what they're filming! And try and get yourself a part as an extra!!! | ||
| ||
| by update - Wed 12th Dec 2001, 9:58pm | ||
Today, they set the fire alarm off.
Three times and counting...Twice. | ||
| ||
| by the peace has been shattered - Wed 12th Dec 2001, 9:48pm | ||
| Not a rowing story, but I found it amusing:
A film crew arrived in Burrell's yesterday (don't know what they're filming, but it looks amateur-ish). They're living in my block, and are generally being annoying. In particular, they are using a smoke machine in one of the rooms in the bottom of Butler House. Today, they set the fire alarm off. Twice. The first time, everybody was gathered outside. Suddenly, one of them asked (in a genuinely suprised voice): "Was that us?!?" The second time, whilst most people were leaving the building, I noticed one of them filming the smoke alarm. He was still filming when we re-enetered a few minutes later. They also asked the porter (who was already pretty annoyed) to turn off the fire alarm for all of Butler House. He was not impressed... | ||
| ||
| by Simon - Wed 12th Dec 2001, 5:57pm | ||
Various people have tried doing web searches for "beeramid" as well.... on Google we come 2nd ;-) First and Third towers over the efforts of the fellow from the University of Virginia... | ||
| ||
| by mcp - Wed 12th Dec 2001, 5:55pm | ||
| Somebody reached our website the other day by searching for the two words "lillettes wings" on Google. Very odd. Rather bizarrely this does yield a result - but only one....
Various people have tried doing web searches for "beeramid" as well.... on Google we come 2nd ;-) | ||
| ||
| by mjb - Wed 5th Dec 2001, 5:01pm | ||
| Funny how they think it was this year's crash. | ||
| ||
| by mcp - Wed 5th Dec 2001, 3:00pm | ||
| Your web server has had it now, JPD.... ;-) | ||
| ||
| by gf - Wed 5th Dec 2001, 12:35pm | ||
| I see FaT have made it onto the Slug again. | ||
| ||
| by Gossip King - Sat 10th Nov 2001, 11:12pm | ||
| Nice to see Anna making an impact on the Magdalene men this evening..... | ||
| ||
| by In my day... - Sun 28th Oct 2001, 10:59pm | ||
Hope the rest of the club can manage to follow our example. Hope Guy can follow my example and cancel the whole thing and move it to April when it's warm and dry... | ||
| ||
| by In The Second Round - Sun 28th Oct 2001, 10:20pm | ||
Well done to all crews who got through the first round of Uni IVs today. Thank you. Hope the rest of the club can manage to follow our example. | ||
| ||
| by Good with cheese on - Sun 28th Oct 2001, 9:17pm | ||
| I've got an overwhelming number of things to do and my room smells of cauliflower. It's not ideal. Well done to all crews who got through the first round of Uni IVs today. | ||
| ||
| by KSS - Thu 25th Oct 2001, 8:34pm | ||
| Wait and see. Or rather, listen. | ||
| ||
| by Cynic - Thu 25th Oct 2001, 6:19pm | ||
KSS wrote: Well...I think JMG and I might have found a rather nifty way to do the mixing.
Don't tell me - you're going to have all the records on vinyl, and then play two at once and get their beats to match and then slowly switch from one to another. Or is that too traditional? | ||
| ||
| by KSS - Wed 24th Oct 2001, 6:36pm | ||
| Well...I think JMG and I might have found a rather nifty way to do the mixing.
Keep those requests rolling in! | ||
| ||
| by MTV - Wed 24th Oct 2001, 7:39am | ||
Bowler hat wrote: Is Starlight the one that's in the chart at the moment with a cartoon video where a load of aliens start dancing along as well? Cos that's quite good. Yep, that's the one. Actually, now that you come to mention it, it is quite good, isn't it ? | ||
| ||
| by jpd - Wed 24th Oct 2001, 7:06am | ||
Jamiroquai is too slow JPD, cut it out. Yes, you're right. But Dan W is doing the playlist and then I'm mixing it, so it's up to him really. I have no idea what the video to any of these songs looks like. | ||
| ||
| by Bowler hat - Tue 23rd Oct 2001, 9:28pm | ||
Jamiroqui - Little L
Don't know the Ones song, can someone hum it for me?
Kylie Minogue - Can't Get You Out Of My Head Madonna - Music Ones, The - Flawless Prodigy - Breathe Supermen Lovers - Starlight Is Starlight the one that's in the chart at the moment with a cartoon video where a load of aliens start dancing along as well? Cos that's quite good. Jamiroquai is too slow JPD, cut it out. | ||
| ||
| by sat - Mon 22nd Oct 2001, 8:27am | ||
bad taste wrote: Ones, The - Flawless
Did anyone see TOTP on Friday? I think it was The Ones on and they were VERY ODD. | ||
| ||
| by bad taste - Fri 19th Oct 2001, 7:22am | ||
He-Man wrote: But I meant the overall statistics, as I said. Idiot. Well I have been on the college network all summer (i.e. probably as long as you have been viewing the website).
Anyway, this is getting anal and boring now. How about some bop songs? These sound good early on a Friday morning to me, and according to the archive haven't been in a bop before: Berri - The Sunshine After The Rain Dreadzone - Little Britain Gala - Freed From Desire Jamiroqui - Little L Kylie Minogue - Can't Get You Out Of My Head Madonna - Music Ones, The - Flawless Prodigy - Breathe Supermen Lovers - Starlight | ||
| ||
| by He-Man - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 10:46pm | ||
jpd wrote: Learn to read: this analysis is only for the last month. For which I have been here more than you. But I meant the overall statistics, as I said. Idiot. | ||
| ||
| by jpd - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 6:49pm | ||
I Have The Power wrote: Of course more worrying is jpd's overall position, since he had no network access last year Learn to read: this analysis is only for the last month. For which I have been here more than you. | ||
| ||
| by KSS - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 5:39pm | ||
| It's just that I've watched that novice video a few times. Honest. | ||
| ||
| by I Have The Power - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 5:20pm | ||
mcp wrote: I note that Byrne and Walker have emerged as the new power users of the website, accounting for over 18% of the bytes downloaded over the last month, with a whopping total of 8000 requests between them.
Of course more worrying is jpd's overall position, since he had no network access last year | ||
| ||
| by Power user - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 3:31pm | ||
mcp wrote: I note that Byrne and Walker have emerged as the new power users of the website, accounting for over 18% of the bytes downloaded over the last month, with a whopping total of 8000 requests between them. My only excuse is that every time I open Internet Explorer, it loads up the FaT site ... | ||
| ||
| by mcp - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 2:49pm | ||
| I note that Byrne and Walker have emerged as the new power users of the website, accounting for over 18% of the bytes downloaded over the last month, with a whopping total of 8000 requests between them.
I didn't realise there was that much to look at ;-) ref: last month's stats | ||
| ||
| by KSS - Mon 15th Oct 2001, 9:37pm | ||
| This is all boring banter. JPD and I are already wasting our time on the bop - any suggestions re. the playlist?
To me please. (and if anyone suggests Whigfield........) | ||
| ||
| by gf - Mon 1st Oct 2001, 11:31am | ||
| Eh? | ||
| ||
| by Dubya - Fri 28th Sep 2001, 11:17am | ||
gf wrote: I propose that fines are increased if the post in question is from a coxswain or steersman who has not posted previously. We certainly shouldn't tolerate any crap first posts from them. Or dittons. What the hell is a grassy post? | ||
| ||
| by gf - Thu 27th Sep 2001, 12:39pm | ||
| I propose that fines are increased if the post in question is from a coxswain or steersman who has not posted previously. We certainly shouldn't tolerate any crap first posts from them. Or dittons. | ||
| ||
| by Dubya - Tue 25th Sep 2001, 12:13am | ||
an admirer wrote: i.e. Small Americans ("SAs") should note that partners of SAs will not be held financially liable for breaches of this rule. The relevant SA is fully liable for breaches of the rule by their partner(s) which result from their own negligence (e.g. scratching, breakage, failure to wash down after use, failure to load properly and in good time). This SA is fairly confused by all this. In what way have I been negligent? | ||
| ||
| by an admirer - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 9:17pm | ||
mcp wrote: My original plan had been that the captains would be liable for etc... i.e. Small Americans ("SAs") should note that partners of SAs will not be held financially liable for breaches of this rule. The relevant SA is fully liable for breaches of the rule by their partner(s) which result from their own negligence (e.g. scratching, breakage, failure to wash down after use, failure to load properly and in good time). | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 6:10pm | ||
mcp wrote: Now what were you thinking of? Why that of course.
And I'm not sure I like the whole spouses thing either. | ||
| ||
| by mcp - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 6:08pm | ||
| Performance wrt posting crap messages, clearly, since that is the subject under discussion. Now what were you thinking of? | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 5:58pm | ||
Sarah wrote: And what kind of 'preformance' are we talking here?!! Ok, perhaps I should learn to spell. | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 5:57pm | ||
| And what kind of 'preformance' are we talking here?!! | ||
| Show 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 | |
