Message Board
Banter
Message board > Banter | 177 to 196 of 206 |
by jpd - Wed 24th Oct 2001, 7:06am | ||
Jamiroquai is too slow JPD, cut it out. Yes, you're right. But Dan W is doing the playlist and then I'm mixing it, so it's up to him really. I have no idea what the video to any of these songs looks like. | ||
by Bowler hat - Tue 23rd Oct 2001, 9:28pm | ||
Jamiroqui - Little L
Don't know the Ones song, can someone hum it for me?
Kylie Minogue - Can't Get You Out Of My Head Madonna - Music Ones, The - Flawless Prodigy - Breathe Supermen Lovers - Starlight Is Starlight the one that's in the chart at the moment with a cartoon video where a load of aliens start dancing along as well? Cos that's quite good. Jamiroquai is too slow JPD, cut it out. | ||
by sat - Mon 22nd Oct 2001, 8:27am | ||
bad taste wrote: Ones, The - Flawless
Did anyone see TOTP on Friday? I think it was The Ones on and they were VERY ODD. | ||
by bad taste - Fri 19th Oct 2001, 7:22am | ||
He-Man wrote: But I meant the overall statistics, as I said. Idiot. Well I have been on the college network all summer (i.e. probably as long as you have been viewing the website).
Anyway, this is getting anal and boring now. How about some bop songs? These sound good early on a Friday morning to me, and according to the archive haven't been in a bop before: Berri - The Sunshine After The Rain Dreadzone - Little Britain Gala - Freed From Desire Jamiroqui - Little L Kylie Minogue - Can't Get You Out Of My Head Madonna - Music Ones, The - Flawless Prodigy - Breathe Supermen Lovers - Starlight | ||
by He-Man - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 10:46pm | ||
jpd wrote: Learn to read: this analysis is only for the last month. For which I have been here more than you. But I meant the overall statistics, as I said. Idiot. | ||
by jpd - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 6:49pm | ||
I Have The Power wrote: Of course more worrying is jpd's overall position, since he had no network access last year Learn to read: this analysis is only for the last month. For which I have been here more than you. | ||
by KSS - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 5:39pm | ||
It's just that I've watched that novice video a few times. Honest. | ||
by I Have The Power - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 5:20pm | ||
mcp wrote: I note that Byrne and Walker have emerged as the new power users of the website, accounting for over 18% of the bytes downloaded over the last month, with a whopping total of 8000 requests between them.
Of course more worrying is jpd's overall position, since he had no network access last year | ||
by Power user - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 3:31pm | ||
mcp wrote: I note that Byrne and Walker have emerged as the new power users of the website, accounting for over 18% of the bytes downloaded over the last month, with a whopping total of 8000 requests between them. My only excuse is that every time I open Internet Explorer, it loads up the FaT site ... | ||
by mcp - Thu 18th Oct 2001, 2:49pm | ||
I note that Byrne and Walker have emerged as the new power users of the website, accounting for over 18% of the bytes downloaded over the last month, with a whopping total of 8000 requests between them.
I didn't realise there was that much to look at ;-) ref: last month's stats | ||
by KSS - Mon 15th Oct 2001, 9:37pm | ||
This is all boring banter. JPD and I are already wasting our time on the bop - any suggestions re. the playlist?
To me please. (and if anyone suggests Whigfield........) | ||
by gf - Mon 1st Oct 2001, 11:31am | ||
Eh? | ||
by Dubya - Fri 28th Sep 2001, 11:17am | ||
gf wrote: I propose that fines are increased if the post in question is from a coxswain or steersman who has not posted previously. We certainly shouldn't tolerate any crap first posts from them. Or dittons. What the hell is a grassy post? | ||
by gf - Thu 27th Sep 2001, 12:39pm | ||
I propose that fines are increased if the post in question is from a coxswain or steersman who has not posted previously. We certainly shouldn't tolerate any crap first posts from them. Or dittons. | ||
by Dubya - Tue 25th Sep 2001, 12:13am | ||
an admirer wrote: i.e. Small Americans ("SAs") should note that partners of SAs will not be held financially liable for breaches of this rule. The relevant SA is fully liable for breaches of the rule by their partner(s) which result from their own negligence (e.g. scratching, breakage, failure to wash down after use, failure to load properly and in good time). This SA is fairly confused by all this. In what way have I been negligent? | ||
by an admirer - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 9:17pm | ||
mcp wrote: My original plan had been that the captains would be liable for etc... i.e. Small Americans ("SAs") should note that partners of SAs will not be held financially liable for breaches of this rule. The relevant SA is fully liable for breaches of the rule by their partner(s) which result from their own negligence (e.g. scratching, breakage, failure to wash down after use, failure to load properly and in good time). | ||
by Sarah - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 6:10pm | ||
mcp wrote: Now what were you thinking of? Why that of course.
And I'm not sure I like the whole spouses thing either. | ||
by mcp - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 6:08pm | ||
Performance wrt posting crap messages, clearly, since that is the subject under discussion. Now what were you thinking of? | ||
by Sarah - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 5:58pm | ||
Sarah wrote: And what kind of 'preformance' are we talking here?!! Ok, perhaps I should learn to spell. | ||
by Sarah - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 5:57pm | ||
And what kind of 'preformance' are we talking here?!! |
Show 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 |