Message Board
Crosswords and other puzzles
For discussion of all forms of mental gymnastics, especially that baffling final clue
Message board > Crosswords and other puzzles | 44 to 63 of 153 |
by RTT - Mon 5th Mar 2007, 12:51am | ||
One for the venatoris: A rallying cry for the two leaders (4,4). | ||
by awesome! - Sun 4th Mar 2007, 11:22pm | ||
but I don't think I got most of that clue..! (which reflects my crossword inability rather than your clue ming!) | ||
by MC Chung - Sun 4th Mar 2007, 10:57pm | ||
same woe - that's what we are, according to Andy, but different this time! (7) | ||
by MC Chung - Sun 4th Mar 2007, 9:50pm | ||
Double Headship. Not bad Neil, I'm impressed. | ||
by Neil T - Sun 4th Mar 2007, 9:02pm | ||
Not from tomorrow's Times Crossword (Mars Bar for the first correct answer): First and Third decked in gold and blue remarkably crown end of Bumps with it (6, 8) | ||
by past it - Mon 22nd Jan 2007, 10:05am | ||
Neil T said: I don't know of anything lower than this. Diving is.. I'd be eligible to dive 'masters'. If I could dive that is. It caters for 'adults of all abilities', so I presume the lower limit is 18. | ||
by Neil T - Fri 28th Jul 2006, 7:59am | ||
RTT said: We were wondering at work today which sport has the lowest age for veteran / master status. Rowing (27) is obviously pretty low, but then this is mainly because it is sub-categorised and thus flexible enough to have something approaching a fair system for any age. Still, there must be something lower. Women's gymnastics maybe (bet that'd be about 16....)? In swimming the qualification age for 'Masters' events is 25. I don't know of anything lower than this. | ||
by RTT - Fri 28th Jul 2006, 7:31am | ||
We were wondering at work today which sport has the lowest age for veteran / master status. Rowing (27) is obviously pretty low, but then this is mainly because it is sub-categorised and thus flexible enough to have something approaching a fair system for any age. Still, there must be something lower. Women's gymnastics maybe (bet that'd be about 16....)? | ||
by Neil T - Tue 25th Jul 2006, 1:55pm | ||
Neil T said: From Saturday's Times: Answer: UltrasonicToo high to catch? (10) | ||
by Roy Walker - Mon 24th Jul 2006, 10:38am | ||
Mike said: [me at] frontstops? It's good, but it's not the one. | ||
by Mike - Mon 24th Jul 2006, 10:15am | ||
Neil T said: From Saturday's Times: [me at] frontstops?Too high to catch? (10) | ||
by Neil T - Sun 23rd Jul 2006, 4:53pm | ||
From Saturday's Times: Too high to catch? (10) | ||
by RTT - Wed 22nd Feb 2006, 11:30pm | ||
Funniest clue I've seen in ages (no prizes for guessing the publication): OBN candidate gets to be repellant penetrating a dog (10)? | ||
by Get your PBs down - Tue 31st Jan 2006, 1:26pm | ||
To all crossworders: DO THE TIMES TODAY. I have just reduced my PB to 4'04". | ||
by Neil T - Tue 31st Jan 2006, 1:21pm | ||
This may be too late, but... 10 RP is 10 Rillington Place, the scene of several grisly murders a la Fred West. (Also a film I think.) GET IN!! | ||
by Simon - Tue 17th Jan 2006, 8:50pm | ||
gf said: Depending on which one you believe from a selection of four sources I've found so far, there are 8, 9, 17 or... 10 Royal Parks. I was in the green that is bordered by the Palace of Westminster, Millbank, and the Thames this morning, and the by-laws posted there named 20 sites which are managed by the Royal Parks. | ||
by Mike - Tue 17th Jan 2006, 5:29pm | ||
The Power said: 1, 18 next? Yup. I'm ashamed to say I didn't get it at the time. | ||
by The Power - Tue 17th Jan 2006, 3:53pm | ||
Mike said: A nice one from Radio 1 this morning: 1, 18 next?What is the next number in this sequence? 16, 8, 11, 14, 9, 12, 5, 20 | ||
by Mike - Tue 17th Jan 2006, 2:50pm | ||
A nice one from Radio 1 this morning: What is the next number in this sequence? 16, 8, 11, 14, 9, 12, 5, 20 | ||
by Andy - Tue 10th Jan 2006, 11:02am | ||
we had this argument in the boat house, whether, a billion was, 1,000,000,000 or 1,000,000,000,000 And also whether an octillion is 10^48 or 10^27, I'm not using any of that inferior american arithmetic |
Show 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 |