Message Board
Banter
| Message board > Banter | 187 to 206 of 206 |
 | |
  |
| ||
| by KSS - Mon 15th Oct 2001, 9:37pm | ||
| This is all boring banter. JPD and I are already wasting our time on the bop - any suggestions re. the playlist?
To me please. (and if anyone suggests Whigfield........) | ||
| ||
| by gf - Mon 1st Oct 2001, 11:31am | ||
| Eh? | ||
| ||
| by Dubya - Fri 28th Sep 2001, 11:17am | ||
gf wrote: I propose that fines are increased if the post in question is from a coxswain or steersman who has not posted previously. We certainly shouldn't tolerate any crap first posts from them. Or dittons. What the hell is a grassy post? | ||
| ||
| by gf - Thu 27th Sep 2001, 12:39pm | ||
| I propose that fines are increased if the post in question is from a coxswain or steersman who has not posted previously. We certainly shouldn't tolerate any crap first posts from them. Or dittons. | ||
| ||
| by Dubya - Tue 25th Sep 2001, 12:13am | ||
an admirer wrote: i.e. Small Americans ("SAs") should note that partners of SAs will not be held financially liable for breaches of this rule. The relevant SA is fully liable for breaches of the rule by their partner(s) which result from their own negligence (e.g. scratching, breakage, failure to wash down after use, failure to load properly and in good time). This SA is fairly confused by all this. In what way have I been negligent? | ||
| ||
| by an admirer - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 9:17pm | ||
mcp wrote: My original plan had been that the captains would be liable for etc... i.e. Small Americans ("SAs") should note that partners of SAs will not be held financially liable for breaches of this rule. The relevant SA is fully liable for breaches of the rule by their partner(s) which result from their own negligence (e.g. scratching, breakage, failure to wash down after use, failure to load properly and in good time). | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 6:10pm | ||
mcp wrote: Now what were you thinking of? Why that of course.
And I'm not sure I like the whole spouses thing either. | ||
| ||
| by mcp - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 6:08pm | ||
| Performance wrt posting crap messages, clearly, since that is the subject under discussion. Now what were you thinking of? | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 5:58pm | ||
Sarah wrote: And what kind of 'preformance' are we talking here?!! Ok, perhaps I should learn to spell. | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 5:57pm | ||
| And what kind of 'preformance' are we talking here?!! | ||
| ||
| by mcp - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 5:35pm | ||
| My original plan had been that the captains would be liable for the performance (or lack thereof) of their spouses... | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 4:54pm | ||
| Does this mean the captain is never going to pay any fines? Personally, I think he should be fined for being at work and spending the afternoon e-mailing instead ;-) | ||
| ||
| by Dubya - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 4:40pm | ||
the webmaster wrote: Crap posts are banned. Any breach of this rule will be subject to a fine - 5 pounds for the first offence, to be doubled for each repeat offence. I should remind you that all fines can be waived at the discretion of the Captain. unless we rewrite the rules. Which we are going to do before they come into effect. | ||
| ||
| by the webmaster - Mon 24th Sep 2001, 2:59pm | ||
| Crap posts are banned. Any breach of this rule will be subject to a fine - 5 pounds for the first offence, to be doubled for each repeat offence. | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Sat 22nd Sep 2001, 9:54pm | ||
| and you in turn were right, that was a crap post. Darling. | ||
| ||
| by Dubya - Sat 22nd Sep 2001, 9:36pm | ||
| you're right about the vitamins, i was just Soooo hungry. i will come over to yours now. dear. | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Sat 22nd Sep 2001, 6:42pm | ||
| Well stop eating so many vitamin (sorry, vIIIItamin) tablets. I keep telling you they are bad for you. Dear. | ||
| ||
| by Dubya - Sat 22nd Sep 2001, 5:38pm | ||
| stop kippering dear. try to stop losing things. | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Fri 21st Sep 2001, 10:28am | ||
| Ok, I am officially a complete kipper. I sent off my ARA renewal form last week and have just had it sent back to me. I forgot to sign the cheque ;-) | ||
| ||
| by Sarah - Tue 18th Sep 2001, 11:53am | ||
| Coming through Immigration after the recent Lightweight trip to Taiwan, JW needed to renew his Visa. Apparently the woman there did not believe he was American and thought he sounded English. Hmmmm..... | ||
| Show 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 | |
