Message Board
Crosswords and other puzzles
For discussion of all forms of mental gymnastics, especially that baffling final clue
Message board > Crosswords and other puzzles | 41 to 60 of 153 |
by Richard - Wed 7th Mar 2007, 10:29am | ||
MC Chung said: same woe - that's what we are, according to Andy, but different this time! (7) I'm not particularly good at cryptic crosswords, but "same woe" is an anagram of awesome, which seems to fit the bill. | ||
by RTT - Tue 6th Mar 2007, 8:24pm | ||
Neil T said: I guess one of the words is probably 'head'? Nope. | ||
by Neil T - Tue 6th Mar 2007, 9:49am | ||
A rallying cry for the two leaders (4,4). Struggling a bit with this one. I guess one of the words is probably 'head'?A couple of people have asked for an explanation of the (6, 8) clue below, so here it is: 'First and Third decked in gold' = 'gold' with the first and third letters removed ('decked') = OD so: 'First and Third decked in gold and blue remarkably' = OD and BLUE 'remarkably' (anagrammed) = DOUBLE 'crown' = HEAD 'end of Bumps' = S 'with it' = HIP (as in 'trendy') and the whole clue is also the definition. | ||
by RTT - Mon 5th Mar 2007, 12:51am | ||
One for the venatoris: A rallying cry for the two leaders (4,4). | ||
by awesome! - Sun 4th Mar 2007, 11:22pm | ||
but I don't think I got most of that clue..! (which reflects my crossword inability rather than your clue ming!) | ||
by MC Chung - Sun 4th Mar 2007, 10:57pm | ||
same woe - that's what we are, according to Andy, but different this time! (7) | ||
by MC Chung - Sun 4th Mar 2007, 9:50pm | ||
Double Headship. Not bad Neil, I'm impressed. | ||
by Neil T - Sun 4th Mar 2007, 9:02pm | ||
Not from tomorrow's Times Crossword (Mars Bar for the first correct answer): First and Third decked in gold and blue remarkably crown end of Bumps with it (6, 8) | ||
by past it - Mon 22nd Jan 2007, 10:05am | ||
Neil T said: I don't know of anything lower than this. Diving is.. I'd be eligible to dive 'masters'. If I could dive that is. It caters for 'adults of all abilities', so I presume the lower limit is 18. | ||
by Neil T - Fri 28th Jul 2006, 7:59am | ||
RTT said: We were wondering at work today which sport has the lowest age for veteran / master status. Rowing (27) is obviously pretty low, but then this is mainly because it is sub-categorised and thus flexible enough to have something approaching a fair system for any age. Still, there must be something lower. Women's gymnastics maybe (bet that'd be about 16....)? In swimming the qualification age for 'Masters' events is 25. I don't know of anything lower than this. | ||
by RTT - Fri 28th Jul 2006, 7:31am | ||
We were wondering at work today which sport has the lowest age for veteran / master status. Rowing (27) is obviously pretty low, but then this is mainly because it is sub-categorised and thus flexible enough to have something approaching a fair system for any age. Still, there must be something lower. Women's gymnastics maybe (bet that'd be about 16....)? | ||
by Neil T - Tue 25th Jul 2006, 1:55pm | ||
Neil T said: From Saturday's Times: Answer: UltrasonicToo high to catch? (10) | ||
by Roy Walker - Mon 24th Jul 2006, 10:38am | ||
Mike said: [me at] frontstops? It's good, but it's not the one. | ||
by Mike - Mon 24th Jul 2006, 10:15am | ||
Neil T said: From Saturday's Times: [me at] frontstops?Too high to catch? (10) | ||
by Neil T - Sun 23rd Jul 2006, 4:53pm | ||
From Saturday's Times: Too high to catch? (10) | ||
by RTT - Wed 22nd Feb 2006, 11:30pm | ||
Funniest clue I've seen in ages (no prizes for guessing the publication): OBN candidate gets to be repellant penetrating a dog (10)? | ||
by Get your PBs down - Tue 31st Jan 2006, 1:26pm | ||
To all crossworders: DO THE TIMES TODAY. I have just reduced my PB to 4'04". | ||
by Neil T - Tue 31st Jan 2006, 1:21pm | ||
This may be too late, but... 10 RP is 10 Rillington Place, the scene of several grisly murders a la Fred West. (Also a film I think.) GET IN!! | ||
by Simon - Tue 17th Jan 2006, 8:50pm | ||
gf said: Depending on which one you believe from a selection of four sources I've found so far, there are 8, 9, 17 or... 10 Royal Parks. I was in the green that is bordered by the Palace of Westminster, Millbank, and the Thames this morning, and the by-laws posted there named 20 sites which are managed by the Royal Parks. | ||
by Mike - Tue 17th Jan 2006, 5:29pm | ||
The Power said: 1, 18 next? Yup. I'm ashamed to say I didn't get it at the time. |
Show 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 |