| 10th Nov '03 | Intra-FaT Erg Challenge | by ccsi |
4 Teams comprising the Light IV, 1st IV, 2nd IV and four from this year's novices will race in a format similar to Queen's Ergo competition.
Each team is to complete 8 * 500m so each competitor must race twice.
I reckon it will be bloody close... |
 |
| by ccsi - Mon 10th Nov 2003, 5:15pm | |
| I should have put that this is going to happen at 6pm on Wednesday 12th November. |
 |
| by Dan - Mon 10th Nov 2003, 5:54pm | |
| actually i meant to tell everyone its now going to be a little bit later. we are aiming for a 6:15 kick off as some of the novices have supervisions finishing at 6. Also the plan is to get 8 novices so they only have to do it once each. |
 |
| by jmg - Wed 12th Nov 2003, 12:30pm | |
Each team is to complete 8 * 500m so each competitor must race twice. Surely the novices should be allowed eight competitors, in the style of my and Tom's 'Elite 2-' from a couple of years back? |
 |
| by Ingers - Wed 12th Nov 2003, 12:55pm | |
| That is the plan. See Dan's comment |
 |
| by mjb - Wed 12th Nov 2003, 2:07pm | |
jmg said: ... 'Elite 2-' from a couple of years back? Does anyone still have the times for that one ? |
 |
| by Dubya - Wed 12th Nov 2003, 2:55pm | |
mjb said: Does anyone still have the times for that one ? https://jwe21.trin.cam.ac.uk/ free_ergo_challenge/results.htm
I don't know how to make this a link, so that's what you get. |
 |
| by Dubya - Wed 12th Nov 2003, 2:57pm | |
mjb said: Does anyone still have the times for that one ?
Place: 2. 1st and 3rd E2-
CREW MEMBER FINAL
T Rose 1.37.4
J Glass 1.30.0
T Rose 1.37.5
J Glass 1.29.9
T Rose 1.38.1
J Glass 1.30.0
T Rose 1.39.4
J Glass 1.28.2
==============================
TOTAL 12.30.5 |
 |
| by mjb - Wed 12th Nov 2003, 3:17pm | |
Dubya said: 12.30.5 Bet the novices go slower than that |
 |
| by Martin - Wed 12th Nov 2003, 3:26pm | |
Dan said: Also the plan is to get 8 novices so they only have to do it once each. I'm not sure this will do the novice team any favours - I'd expect a team of 8 to go slower than the best four would doubling up... |